
Rainwater system team in action!
Last week we brought parts of the design and permitting teams together to work through the final details of the rainwater catchment system. It is one of the very last details to be resolved prior to approval of the building permits. I thought the discussion was an interesting example of process and evolution in the design process. Participating were Dennis Rominger, Howland Homes project manager; Mark Weirenga, project architect from David Vandervort Architects; John Minato, City of Issaquah Building Official; Sylvia des Rochers, City of Issaquah plans examiner; Doug Schlepp, City review engineer; Mark Buehrer, system design engineer with 2020 Engineering; and myself.
The design team proposed a very simple, elegant system for rainwater recycling. Water from the roofs flows into a gutter and downspout and then directly into a cistern (one for each home). Rainwater is then pumped into the homes, where it is placed in a pressure tank, where it then is used in toilets and clotheswashers (I am skipping over many details which will be covered in a later post). In the event that the tanks run dry (unlikely, but possible during a very dry summer) they could be manually refilled by the residents with a hose.
The permit review team’s comments focused mainly on health and maximizing water conservation. To maximize the safety of the system, the design team proposed plumbing the potable and rainwater systems completely separately, so that non-potable water would not be cross contaminated with non-potable water. But to be completely belt and suspenders in terms of safety, the permit team suggested a number of additional measures. First was a backflow prevention device on each unit’s individual water line, so that in the unlikely event that someone at a future date replumbed the homes and mistakenly connected the potable and non-potable systems, that contamination could never enter into the public system. Second, routing of the lines will be done carefully so that potable and non-potable lines are not adjacent. Furthermore, non-potable lines will be clearly labelled at frequent intervals that it is non-potable water.
A lot of attention was given to the refill process for the cistern. The permitting team was concerned that during drought refill, that the hose might be tossed into the cistern, and that however unlikely, a backflow might occur, pulling non-potable water from the cistern into the hose and into the potable system (of course, a very rare occurance). There was also concern that residents might leave the hose running longer than necessary and fill the entire cistern with potable water, rather than a small amount needed to tie the resident over to the next rainfall. Initially the permitting team suggested an automated refill system that would add potable water into the system when it ran low. An air gap would be provided on the refill, to ensure non-potable water couldn’t be syphoned into the potable system.
However, the design team didn’t like the potential of that system breaking down, and also didn’t like the hands off feeling of the automated system – they wanted the residents to be in touch with their system, at least to some degree. So both teams synergistically developed a new idea – a timed manual refill from within the homes, plumbed with an air gap into the downspout system. Physically, it will be impossible for non potable water to be syphoned into the potable system. And the timer will ensure that refilling is limited to that needed for a couple of laundry loads. It is nearly a simple as the original design, keeps the residents connected to their water supply, is more convenient, and addresses some potential health risks (albeit, very low likelihood ones).